Gillingham v
Port Vale
Match statistics
| Gillingham | Port Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Shots | 11 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
| 9 | Corners | 4 |
| 12 | Fouls | 11 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 290 | Passes | 429 |
| 41% | Possession % | 59% |
| 1.70 | xG | 0.88 |
- Over 1.5
- 66%
- Over 2.5
- 39%
- Over 3.5
- 19%
- Both score
- 45%
- Model pick
- Gillingham 41%
- Likely score
- 1-1 14%
- Expected goals
- 1.24 – 0.99
Advised bets
Half wonMembers’ pick, published now the day is over.
★ Members’ pick
Edge strength 5 of 5Port Vale +0.25
Why this price?
Back Port Vale +0.25 on the Asian handicap at 2.10 with Bet365 — Port Vale starts 0.25 goals ahead, so a narrow defeat can still win the bet.
Our model puts the chance at 51% and the bookmakers' own consensus, margin removed, at 54%; we judge it at 53%, weighting the market more than the model, which is a fair price of 1.88. The offered 2.10 implies only 48%, so the price is 11.7% better than our estimate says it should be. That gap is the edge.
Stake 2.00 units of a 100-unit bank: the size follows the edge (a quarter-Kelly fraction), never more than 2 units.
Projected goals: Gillingham 1.24, Port Vale 0.99.
The edge is an estimate and carries model error; it can be wrong, and a losing run is normal.
LostMembers’ pick, published now the day is over.
★ Members’ pick
Edge strength 3 of 5Under 1.5
Why this price?
Back under 1.5 goals at 3.40 with Bet365 — 1 goal or fewer in the match.
Our model puts the chance at 34% and the bookmakers' own consensus, margin removed, at 30%; we judge it at 31%, weighting the market more than the model, which is a fair price of 3.18. The offered 3.40 implies only 29%, so the price is 6.9% better than our estimate says it should be. That gap is the edge.
Stake 0.72 units of a 100-unit bank: the size follows the edge (a quarter-Kelly fraction), never more than 2 units.
Projected goals: Gillingham 1.24, Port Vale 0.99.
The edge is an estimate and carries model error; it can be wrong, and a losing run is normal.
Our probabilities against the market
| Market | Selection | Ours | Fair | Best price | Implied | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total goals | Under 3.5 | 81.3% | 1.23 | 1.29 Betfair | 77.5% | +3.8 |
| Both teams to score | Both teams to score — Yes | 45.4% | 2.21 | 1.87 Betfair | 53.5% | -8.1 |
| Both teams to score | Both teams to score — No | 54.6% | 1.83 | 1.91 William Hill | 52.4% | +2.3 |
| Match result | Gillingham | 41.3% | 2.42 | 3.40 Bet365 | 29.4% | +11.9 |
| Match result | Draw | 29.9% | 3.34 | 3.30 BetVictor | 30.3% | -0.4 |
| Match result | Port Vale | 28.8% | 3.47 | 2.40 William Hill | 41.7% | -12.8 |
| Total goals | Over 1.5 | 66.0% | 1.52 | 1.38 BetVictor | 72.5% | -6.5 |
| Total goals | Under 1.5 | 34.0% | 2.94 | 3.25 Bet365 | 30.8% | +3.3 |
| Total goals | Over 2.5 | 38.6% | 2.59 | 2.15 Bet365 | 46.5% | -7.9 |
| Total goals | Under 2.5 | 61.4% | 1.63 | 1.70 Betano | 58.8% | +2.6 |
| Total goals | Over 3.5 | 18.7% | 5.35 | 4.10 BetVictor | 24.4% | -5.7 |
A positive gap means our probability is higher than the price implies. That is information, not a recommendation: a pick is only published where the gap clears our bar after allowing for model error, and those appear above.
Gillingham favoured against Port Vale
Our model makes Gillingham 41% to win this League Two fixture, with the draw at 30% and Port Vale at 29%. The goal projection is 1.24 for Gillingham against 0.99 for Port Vale — a slight edge to Gillingham on expected output. A combined 2.23 goals points to a cagey game with few clear chances, which puts over 2.5 at 39% and both teams to score at 45%. The single most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 14%, though no individual scoreline is ever likely in absolute terms — that is the nature of a low-scoring sport. Note that even our favoured side is under 45% to win outright, so this is a fixture where the draw does a lot of work and confident calls are not warranted. All figures come from a Dixon–Coles adjusted Poisson model fitted on recent results and expected goals. They are estimates, not forecasts of fact.
- Most likely scores
- 1-1 14%
- 1-0 13%
- 0-0 11%
- 0-1 10%
- 2-0 8%
This season
| Gillingham | Port Vale | |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Played | 12 |
| 5-5-4 | W-D-L | 4-3-5 |
| 1.43 | Pts / game | 1.25 |
| 1.43 | Goals for / game | 0.83 |
| 1.36 | Goals against / game | 1.17 |
| 57% | Over 2.5 | 17% |
| 57% | BTTS | 33% |
| 29% | Clean sheets | 33% |
| 29% | Failed to score | 42% |
| 2-3-2 | Home record | 4-2-0 |
| 3-2-2 | Away record | 0-1-5 |
| W1 | Streak | W1 |
2026/27 league matches only, computed from results on record. Gillingham · Port Vale
Full-match statistics, per game this season
Produced
| 8.1 | Shots | 11.6 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3 | Shots on target | 4.8 |
| 3.3 | Corners | 4.8 |
| 3.00 | Cards | 1.60 |
| 15.4 | Fouls | 10.0 |
| 46 | Possession % | 49 |
| 1.31 | xG | 1.79 |
| 7 matches | sample | 5 matches |
Conceded
| 16.0 | Shots | 10.4 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | Shots on target | 3.6 |
| 5.1 | Corners | 5.8 |
| 2.14 | Cards | 1.60 |
| 10.3 | Fouls | 12.0 |
| 54 | Possession % | 51 |
| 1.70 | xG | 0.92 |
| 7 matches | sample | 5 matches |
Form comparison
| Gillingham | Metric | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60 (better) | Goals scored | 1.33 |
| 1.60 | Goals conceded | 0.33 (better) |
| 1.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.06 (better) |
| Big chances | ||
| 2.40 | Shots on target | 4.33 (better) |
| 7.00 | Total shots | 12.67 (better) |
| Touches in opp. box | ||
| 2.40 | Corners | 5.33 (better) |
| 50.8 (better) | Possession % | 50.0 |
| 391 (better) | Passes | 378 |
| Tackles | ||
| 13.60 | Fouls | 13.33 (better) |
| 1.40 (better) | Offsides | 2.00 |
| Throw-ins | ||
| 2.60 | Yellow cards | 1.33 (better) |
| 0.33 | Red cards | 0.00 (better) |
Big chances, Touches in opp. box, Throw-ins are not supplied by our current data provider (api-football). Rather than estimate them and present the estimate as a measurement, we show nothing.
Head to head
Full record →- Gillingham wins
- 0
- Draws
- 1
- Port Vale wins
- 0
- Goals / game
- 2.00
- Over 2.5
- 0%
- Both score
- 100%
- Gillingham v Port Vale1–12026-10-20
League Two table
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salford City | 14 | 10 | 1 | 3 | +10 | 31 | Salford City won 5 of the last 5 |
| 2 | Barnet | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | +10 | 26 | Barnet won 2 of the last 5 |
| 3 | Walsall | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | +9 | 22 | Walsall won 2 of the last 5 |
| 4 | Crewe | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 22 | Crewe won 2 of the last 5 |
| 5 | Cheltenham | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 21 | Cheltenham won 2 of the last 5 |
| 6 | Grimsby | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | +6 | 20 | Grimsby won 2 of the last 5 |
| 7 | York | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | +3 | 20 | York won 1 of the last 5 |
| 8 | Gillingham | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 20 | Gillingham won 2 of the last 5 |
| 9 | Accrington ST | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | +6 | 19 | Accrington ST won 2 of the last 5 |
| 10 | Chesterfield | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | +3 | 19 | Chesterfield won 1 of the last 5 |
| 11 | Tranmere | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | +2 | 19 | Tranmere won 2 of the last 5 |
| 12 | Exeter City | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | +2 | 19 | Exeter City won 3 of the last 5 |
| 13 | Swindon Town | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | -2 | 19 | Swindon Town won 2 of the last 5 |
| 14 | Newport County | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | +3 | 18 | Newport County won 2 of the last 5 |
| 15 | Shrewsbury | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | -5 | 18 | Shrewsbury won 2 of the last 5 |
| 16 | Fleetwood Town | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 17 | Fleetwood Town won 2 of the last 5 |
| 17 | Bristol Rovers | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | -6 | 16 | Bristol Rovers won 0 of the last 5 |
| 18 | Oldham | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 15 | Oldham won 2 of the last 5 |
| 19 | Port Vale | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -4 | 15 | Port Vale won 3 of the last 5 |
| 20 | Rochdale | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | -9 | 15 | Rochdale won 0 of the last 5 |
| 21 | Northampton | 13 | 3 | 5 | 5 | -1 | 14 | Northampton won 2 of the last 5 |
| 22 | Rotherham | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | -7 | 12 | Rotherham won 0 of the last 5 |
| 23 | Colchester | 13 | 2 | 6 | 5 | -7 | 12 | Colchester won 0 of the last 5 |
| 24 | Crawley Town | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -8 | 9 | Crawley Town won 1 of the last 5 |